Intelligence
What the digital-asset treasury universe is doing.
A public read on publicly traded companies that hold Bitcoin and other digital assets on their balance sheets. Crypto prices and options data update in real time on every visit; acquisition filings refresh daily. Everything is sourced from SEC and international public filings; every entry links to the original document.
This is the free public layer. Clients we work with get a more complete picture: deeper risk signals, issuer-level detail, active strategy support, and access to the full suite of execution tools we don't publish here.
Three things to know · Oct 21, 2026
For the executive who won't read the rest of this page.
- 1
Acquisition pace
+11.9k BTC ($976M net buy); prior window net 5.1k BTC. +12.5k ETH ($30M net buy); prior window net 17.4k ETH. +4.0k SOL ($418K net buy); prior window net 2.0k SOL on net across the universe in the last 14 days.
42 acquisition filings (0% vs prior 7-week window). Total net value up from $483M to $1.0B.
- 2
Options market
The BTC options market is leaning bearish this week.
BTC spot $82,373. 30-day implied vol 38%.
Executive summary · last 14 days
What changed across the universe.
Sourced from public SEC filings and equivalent international disclosures. Every acquisition cited here can be traced to a specific public document.
Executive summary
Last 14 days, 131 verified disclosures (prior 14d, 139)
Risk events in focus: 46 flagged across the universe in the last two weeks (prior two weeks: 53).
Click a card to see the underlying filings.
Named risk events
- PWCMNasdaq delisting could follow without a cure period; reverse split expands issuance capacity · $1, $1.00, $0.8311
- ASSTSATS declares first 15% dividends: $1.7264/share across November periods · $1.7264, $0.8710, $0.0658, $0.8554
- ASSTStrive closes $630M SATS IPO at $90/share; confirms debt-free status and 15% daily dividend cadence · $630M, $90, $22.50
- CANCanaan appoints KPMG Singapore as auditor; prior reports unmodified with no disagreements
Themes
A sample of the risks the universe is carrying right now.
Representative patterns drawn from SEC filings and trading activity across publicly traded companies that hold digital assets. We don't name specific companies here; the point is the pattern, not who's carrying it. Clients receive a more complete briefing with issuer-level detail and active monitoring.
- High concern
Convert-window timing risk into a drawdown
Several names funded recent accumulation through convertible issuance with refinancing windows that land inside the next major drawdown window. If discount-to-NAV widens at the wrong moment, the convert window closes and the only remaining options are dilutive equity or selling the reserve into the dip.
- High concern
Counterparty concentration in financing
More than half of the universe runs the bulk of derivatives, lending, and structured-product financing through one or two counterparties. The same pattern that left a wave of issuers stranded in late 2022, this time concentrated in fewer names with bigger absolute exposure. Multi-dealer pricing and cleaner netting language are the standard fixes; few have done either.
- Watch
Hedging not in the disclosure stream
Almost no names disclose explicit hedging language in this period's filings, even as accumulation accelerates. Either books are running unhedged into the quarter, or hedging is happening without the audit trail that survives a CFO transition. Both are operational gaps that auditors increasingly flag.
- Watch
Concentration in custodian and exchange exposure
A small number of custodians hold the majority of the universe's reserves. A small number of exchanges intermediate the bulk of execution. Neither concentration is inherently a problem; both are unmanaged risks at most names because the risk is read at the firm level, not the universe level. A peer-anonymised view of where everyone is custodied changes the conversation.
- Emerging
Policy frameworks that don't survive a regime turn
A growing number of boards have approved derivatives use without a written sizing limit, an audit-trail standard, or a regime trigger that pre-authorises a defensive response. The structure works when nothing surprises; it does not survive the first event that requires a decision faster than a board can be assembled. The fix is procedural and one-time; few have shipped it.
Options market · plain English
What the BTC options market is telling us this week.
A week-over-week read on three things that matter if you hold Bitcoin: how much the market expects prices to move, whether traders are betting prices go up or down, and what it currently costs to insure against a big swing in either direction.
Week-over-week read on the BTC options market
Daily snapshotAs of Oct 22, 6:30 AM ETPlain-English summary of how the market's pricing of BTC has shifted over the past seven days. This card is a once-a-day refresh; the probability map and calculator below are pulled live from Deribit on every page load.
The BTC options market is leaning bearish this week.
BTC spot $82,373 · 30-day implied vol 38%
Expected movement
Traders are pricing in roughly a 11% one-month swing in BTC, similar to last week. The market isn't changing its mind about how big the next month's move will be.
How big a one-month move the market is pricing in.
Bullish or bearish
The market is leaning bearish on BTC: bets on a fall are more expensive than bets on a rise. Traders are paying up to hedge downside. That's a more bearish read than a week ago; the market has been shifting toward paying up for downside protection.
Whether traders are paying up for upside or for downside protection.
Concern about a big move
Concern about an extreme move is at a typical level for crypto. Traders are paying a normal premium for protection against unusually large outcomes. The market is less concerned about a big move than it was a week ago.
How much the market is paying for protection against an extreme outcome.
Futures and financing
What futures prices say about market leverage and financing costs.
Futures prices tell you two things the options market doesn't: how much borrowed money is currently in the market, and what it would cost to hold Bitcoin exposure without actually buying the coin. We flag any case where futures and options markets are implying different things about price; that disagreement is usually the most useful signal on the page.
Futures curve and financing rates
Daily snapshotAs of Oct 22, 6:30 AM ETWhat it costs to hold BTC exposure synthetically through the futures market today, and what perpetual funding tells us about leveraged positioning. The dotted line marks the current short-term US dollar rate (3.88%), as a reference for what an unlevered borrow ought to cost.
BTC leverage is unwinding: funding has cooled materially over the past week.
Perp funding (annualized)
0.0%
Avg implied carry (14d+)
0.8%
USD reference
3.88%
BTC spotlive
$82,373
Leverage in the market
BTC perpetual funding rate is roughly flat at +0.0% annualized. There isn't a strong directional lean in leveraged positioning right now. That's down -5.1pp from a week ago, long leverage is being unwound; the cost of being long is falling.
Whether traders are paying to be long or paying to be short, and whether that pressure is building or unwinding.
Cross-market signal
Both markets are leaning the same direction (bearish). Funding and options skew agree, which is the cleaner signal.
What you should think when futures and options aren't telling the same story.
Your borrow rate vs the futures curve
The BTC futures curve implies a financing cost of about 0.8% annualized to hold BTC exposure synthetically. If you're borrowing dollars to hold spot BTC at a rate materially above this (say, more than 3%), you're leaking yield: the same exposure can be replicated through the futures market at the cheaper rate. If your borrow looks misaligned, talk to us.
What it costs to hold the underlying synthetically; your dollar-borrow rate should be in the same ballpark.
If you're right
What a defined view on price direction could be worth.
Pick a BTC price you think is reachable and a date by which you think it could happen. The calculator shows the most you could lose (what you pay upfront) and the most you could make if you're right. Your loss is capped; you can never lose more than you put in.
Underlying
Liveloading...If you're right
Enter a price you think BTC could reach and a date by which it could happen. The calculator sizes a defined-risk options structure that pays the most if you're right, and reports two numbers: the most you could lose and the most you could earn. Capital at risk is bounded; you can never lose more.
The numbers below are options-only and use the BTC and ETH chains listed on Deribit. We work on any crypto, including assets where no public options market exists today: in those cases we structure synthetic option markets directly with the client (treasury or DAO) and a counterparty network. Crossing asset classes (equities and equity options of correlated names, futures, structured products, financing trades) frequently produces a meaningfully better risk/reward than any single-instrument structure. The full toolkit lives inside the engagement.
Implied price distribution
The market's probability map for BTC.
A map of where the options market thinks BTC could end up at a given date, built from live prices. Drag the slider to pick a price range; the tool shows the probability the market is currently pricing for BTC to land inside that range by the chosen date.
Underlying
Liveloading...Loading current BTC options data from Deribit...
The probability shown is derived from live option prices using a standard market convention. It reflects what traders are collectively pricing in right now, not a prediction of what will happen. It shifts throughout the day as prices move.
Strategic Treasury Intelligence · daily refresh
What publicly traded companies are buying, week by week.
Bitcoin and crypto purchases made by publicly traded companies, sourced from SEC filings. Hover any bar to see which companies bought and how much; click a row below to open the original SEC filing.
Weekly net flows across the DAT universe
As of 2026-10-22- Net BTC
- +75.7K
- $5.83B net
- +107.2K acq · -31.5K disp
- Net ETH
- +902.6K
- $1.90B net
- +906.5K acq · -3,952 disp
- Net SOL
- +276.2K
- $27.0M net
- +341.2K acq · -65.0K disp
Recent named flows
- DFDV↑3,983 SOL$418.1K$418.1KDFDV adds 3,983 SOL, bringing treasury to 2.59M SOL · 3,983 SOL, 2.59M SOL2026-W43
- ASST↑1,223 BTC$100.3M$100.3MStrive adds 1,223 BTC at ~$81.7k; holdings reach 36,818 as warrants expire · 1,223 BTC, $81.7k, 36,818 BTC, $630M2026-W43
- ASST↑4,045 BTC$331.8M$331.8MStrive sets SATS IPO settlement for Oct 20; acquires 4,045 BTC at $82,803 · 4,045 BTC, $82,803, $630M, $82,803,2026-W43
- MSTR↑267 BTC$21.9M$21.9MStrategy adds 267 BTC at ~$82.9k; holdings reach 848,517 · 267 BTC, $82.9k, 848,517 BTC, $82,9002026-W43
- BMNR↑12.5K ETH$30.2M$30.2MBitmine ETH treasury hits 6.04M as cash draws to $582M and staking projections cut · $582M, $90M, 12,535 ETH, $582 million2026-W43
- ASST↑2,822 BTC$230.3M$230.3M$369.2M PIPE warrant exercise exhausts warrants; 2,822 BTC bought at $83.3k · $369.2M, 2,822 BTC, $83.3k, $83,2662026-W42
Each flow is tied to a specific public filing. Bars above the axis are acquisitions; bars below are dispositions. A red ring marks a sale flagged stress (covenant, margin call, going-concern, default, or similar language in the filing). USD uses historical close on the disclosure date. Aggregate research summaries that don't cite a single issuer are excluded.
Reference library
Canonical pages on Bitcoin treasury derivatives governance.
Reference pages on the legal structures, internal policies, and trading contracts involved in running a Bitcoin derivatives program at a public company. Each page is written to answer one specific question as clearly as possible.
Bitcoin treasury derivatives governance
The pillar page: what derivatives governance is, the eight components, and why it matters.
Read →
Governance spine
The written policy document that defines how a company decides to use derivatives, how big positions can get, and what must be disclosed, before a crisis forces the question.
Read →
Convexity leakage
The gradual loss of potential upside that happens when a derivatives program is structured or executed poorly. Measurable and fixable.
Read →
BTC loan vs futures vs options
Side-by-side comparison of three common ways to structure a Bitcoin treasury position, covering capital required, risk, and governance complexity.
Read →
Board-approved derivatives policy
The eight things that should be in a written derivatives policy before a public company's audit committee will approve the program.
Read →
ISDA / CSA checklist
The four contract terms that have the biggest financial impact when a public Bitcoin company is negotiating a trading agreement with a derivatives dealer.
Read →
Counterparty risk in crypto derivatives
How to score, limit, and monitor the risk that a trading counterparty fails to perform. Five-step framework with exit triggers.
Read →
Covered call risk for a Bitcoin treasury
Why selling covered calls on a Bitcoin reserve is giving up future gains, not generating income, and the three situations where it can make sense.
Read →
Bitcoin treasury volatility overlay
A rules-based program that turns a Bitcoin treasury's natural exposure to price swings into a deliberate, board-approved position with defined limits.
Read →
SEC disclosure for crypto derivatives programs
The five-element pattern Corp Fin keeps asking for in comment letters; how to disclose proactively.
Read →
Collar strategy for a bitcoin treasury
How strike, tenor, and financing decide what a collar protects and what upside it gives away.
Read →
Convertible notes risk
The options a bitcoin treasury sells when it issues a convert, and where the maturity and put risk sits.
Read →
What is mNAV?
Market value over net asset value for a digital-asset treasury: how it is computed and why issuance hinges on it.
Read →
Multi-dealer RFQ for crypto options
How a request for quote runs across dealers, why panel size matters, and what to record on every trade.
Read →
Hedging a concentrated crypto position
The choices a holder has when one position dominates the balance sheet and selling is not the answer.
Read →
Ethereum treasury hedging
Hedging an ETH reserve when options depth is thinner than BTC and staked collateral changes what dealers accept.
Read →
Glossary of defined terms
Every term used across the firm, defined precisely so the same word means the same thing to the desk, the audit committee, and the SEC.
Read →
White paper: Operating a Bitcoin treasury derivatives program
The flagship long-form playbook covering governance, instruments, counterparty stack, GAAP elections, and disclosure pattern. Save-as-PDF for offline reading.
Read →
Reference library · Compute
Canonical pages on compute derivatives and AI infrastructure risk.
Reference pages on the forming market for GPU compute: the instruments, the indices, how buyers and capacity owners hedge, and how data-center financing is priced.
What are compute derivatives?
The pillar page: GPU-hour forwards, futures, perpetual swaps, and options, who uses them, and why the market is still early.
Read →
Hedging GPU compute costs
A five-step framework for AI labs and inference platforms that want budget certainty on compute.
Read →
Forward sale vs. fixed-rate lease
What a long-term lease gives away, what a forward program on uncontracted capacity keeps, and how to combine them.
Read →
Compute price indices
How GPU-hour benchmarks are built, why the settlement reference matters, and five tests for evaluating one.
Read →
Miner to AI / HPC conversion risk
The six risks a hosting lease leaves behind for bitcoin miners converting to AI hosting.
Read →
Data-center lease financing
Why similar lease-backed notes price far apart, and how operators capture credit support before going to market.
Read →
What you see here is the public layer. Clients get the full picture.
Clients we work with see all of this inside a private hub, alongside their own portfolio results, issuer-level risk disclosures, scenario planning tools, and execution resources we don't publish publicly. Beyond analysis, we actively help clients deploy strategies: collar programs, defined-risk overlays, and structures designed to increase trading volumes and tighten spreads on their own securities. We work with any digital asset; where no listed options market exists, we build a custom one directly with the client and our network of trading counterparties.
Request Capacity